Veröffentlicht am 2018-03-13 19:16:33 in /int/

/int/ 44270460: News from the legal profession: Britain now has an c...

tusharvikky Avatar

News from the legal profession:

Britain now has an completely arbitrary "I do not like his face let's get him fined"-law.

to_soham Avatar

So I can now sew the Quinn because it's deemed to me I was offended?

iamglimy Avatar

Everyday a little step.
Further and foward.
Everyday a little step.
To though crime.

iamglimy Avatar

Reminder: When you're talking to Britbongs on the krautchan, you're actually talking to Ahmed, Pajeet and Milosz

polarity Avatar

> Your reason for doing it is illegal
Your reason are your beliefs/views/opinions. It is now illegal to have a certain opinion.

RussellBishop Avatar


damenleeturks Avatar

on the britian it is

souperphly Avatar

> literally "i dont say it is a crime.. but it is a crime"
How is it possiblle on the first world?

dpg Avatar

Hating someone is a crime? That's the most orwellian thing I've ever heard.

wahidanggara Avatar

What you've been thinking can make a difference between 1st and 2nd degree murder. Is that thought crime?

abdots Avatar

You'd better not be hatin' on dem bong policies.

oscarowusu Avatar

Well, at least we can legally claim the Holocaust didn't happen.

vicivadeline Avatar

In a murder case, a murder has been actually committed.
You want a metaphor, imagine that you get jailed not because you murdered someone, not because you ever planned to murder someone, not because you are involved in any murder or planning thereof, but because the court figures that if you were to hypothetically commit a murder against someone you'd have a 1st degree motive for it.

Bernd Avatar

nothing wrong with this

breehype Avatar

>brits actually defend this

Bernd Avatar

But it's great, inni

albertaugustin Avatar


I believe that your comment was motivated by prejudice.

*Arrests you and throws you into prison with vicious Muslims and niggers*

wtrsld Avatar

Yes, as long no one believes you're motivated by anti semitic thoughts.

mactopus Avatar

please your Majesty,' said the White Rabbit, jumping up in a great hurry; `this paper has just been picked up.'
`What's in it?' said the Queen.
`I haven't opened it yet,' said the White Rabbit, `but it seems to be a letter, written by the prisoner to--to somebody.'
`It must have been that,' said the King, `unless it was written to nobody, which isn't usual, you know.'
`Who is it directed to?' said one of the jurymen.
`It isn't directed at all,' said the White Rabbit; `in fact, there's nothing written on the outside.' He unfolded the paper as he spoke, and added `It isn't a letter, after all: it's a set of verses.'
`Are they in the prisoner's handwriting?' asked another of they jurymen.
`No, they're not,' said the White Rabbit, `and that's the queerest thing about it.' (The jury all looked puzzled.)
`He must have imitated somebody else's hand,' said the King. (The jury all brightened up again.)
`Please your Majesty,' said the Knave, `I didn't write it, and they can't prove I did: there's no name signed at the end.'
`If you didn't sign it,' said the King, `that only makes the matter worse. You must have meant some mischief, or else you'd have signed your name like an honest man.'
There was a general clapping of hands at this: it was the first really clever thing the King had said that day.

`That proves his guilt,' said the Queen.

rcass Avatar

UK is literally 1984 tier

bluesix Avatar

When you murder someone you are convicted because you committed a crime not because of your motive. This is different. There is no crime in the first place. Having a belief/thought is now a crime itself (thoght-crime).

p_kosov Avatar

Idiocracy as is. Just kill them, kill them with fire.

herrhaase Avatar

Just kill anyone you don't like, don't insult them beforehand.
t. Legal pro

wtrsld Avatar

Big government always fucks everything up.

snowshade Avatar

You should read up on law. It's much more arbitrary than you think. There are all sorts of laws that are phrased something like 'if a reasonable person thinks...'

aiiaiiaii Avatar

Well, what can I say? Slava Ukraine!

keyuri85 Avatar

Even more, you actually don't have to have 'wrong' thoughts, by this law if outsider person believed that you might (while might not) have any thoughts then your are guilt.

So if you do literally nothing, just are sitting in your room and glare at a wall, but then if a junior from a mall where you were just once couple of years ago suddenly believed that you must be have any hatred against him because you probably are deliberately neglecting him and because of that he didn't saw you for more than a year, then you must be imprisoned because obviously by someone's opinion you could have some prejudice against Mohamed the janitor.

robergd Avatar

Holy fuck, Great Britain was the prototype of a nanny state before, but Post-Brexit Britain won't even have the ECJ to appeal this kind of retarded legislation. Just the other day I read about the implementation of even tighter Internet surveillance poorly disguised as mandatory age-proofing for porn sites.

You have no one else to blame. You did this to yourselves.

Freedom truly dies in darkness.

mfacchinello Avatar

> You have no one else to blame.
How about Jews?

jimmywebdev Avatar

>Muslims and niggers in jail
But that would be racist

reported for thought crime

iamglimy Avatar


it's been this way for 20 years

Neuste Fäden in diesem Brett: