Krautkanal.com

Veröffentlicht am 2018-03-13 16:23:23 in /int/

/int/ 44268547: How does to increase IQ? Kc browsing increase IQ?...

n_tassone Avatar
n_tassone:#44268547

How does to increase IQ? Kc browsing increase IQ?

mizhgan Avatar
mizhgan:#44268561

Unironic KC browsing turns you into an iq89 sissy who loves penis and watching gore videos.

thomweerd Avatar
thomweerd:#44268565

no it decrease IQ.

Chakintosh Avatar
Chakintosh:#44268593

You can't.

anhskohbo Avatar
anhskohbo:#44268616

>>44268565
Fug increase IQ?

>>44268561
IQ (D.) correlates with D. (IQ) size?

>>44268593
Said who?

leonfedotov Avatar
leonfedotov:#44268624

>>44268616
Depends on the race.

suribbles Avatar
suribbles:#44268626

>>44268616
>Fug increase IQ?
i don't know but it is definitely better than this shithole.

nateschulte Avatar
nateschulte:#44268636

By doing high math, i think

Bernd Avatar
Bernd:#44268639

Im right about blocking gaycee in my fritzbox and letting my father change the password without ever gibing it to me.
Instead im gonna read books, this site destroyed my life

iamgarth Avatar
iamgarth:#44268649

kc increases knowledge but decreases iq

grantrobinson Avatar
grantrobinson:#44268652

>>44268616
Says me. There is no known way to increase your g factor, if you find one Nature would probably like to hear about it.

rcass Avatar
rcass:#44268655

>>44268636
You mean doing math while smoking weed? Or doing math on top of building?

cat_audi Avatar
cat_audi:#44268658

>>44268639
Fritz, it was about time you realized the state your "country" is.

areus Avatar
areus:#44268668

>>44268658
>brazil
lold, every time XD

syswarren Avatar
syswarren:#44268679

>>44268668
Back to your igloo, snownigger.

Bernd Avatar
Bernd:#44268685

Exercise, diet

sketi_ndlela Avatar
sketi_ndlela:#44268704

>>44268652
>create theoretical measure to assess how good a person performs a specific test to measure the specific measurement you created
>tells everybody you can't change the thing you created

saarabpreet Avatar
saarabpreet:#44268719

IQ can not be increased, it is innate.
All attempts at improving personal IQ have failed.
Population level IQ can be improved by better nutrition to pregnant mothers and children but once it is set you can not improve it.

axel_gillino Avatar
axel_gillino:#44268732

>>44268719
>one cannot increase his cognitive abilities

dutchnadia Avatar
dutchnadia:#44268749

start fasting and get into khetosis.
then ur brains use ketones as energy source and works better

sindresorhus Avatar
sindresorhus:#44268767

You can improve cognitive abilities but you cannot improve intelligence. All studies show that so far no one has figured out a way to improve personal intelligence.

jrxmember Avatar
jrxmember:#44268785

>>44268719
You are being naively superficial. IQ depends on what test is being used. Depending on the test, a great amount of attention is needed. Personally, I have ADD and my IQ before Ritalin (measured with WAIS 3 was 138 (overall, some areas higher and others less). My IQ after Ritalin on WAIS 4 was 145.

I have an extensive research on cognition and psychostimylants using myself as test subject, I can't publish but it gives me a lot of insight to start an actual research project.

Bernd Avatar
Bernd:#44268798

>>44268785
do you also have insights about the long-term damage you might be incurring by using said psychostimulants?

xravil Avatar
xravil:#44268808

>>44268655
Well it's "Further Math" in english

joynalrab Avatar
joynalrab:#44268830

>>44268798
Yes, but they are mainly on the cardiovascular system. Higher blood pressure, for example and my glomerular filtration rate has reduced from 115 to 96 in 5yrs but that is likely physiologic.

I am thinking about having an echocardio performed once a year to see if I get any hypertrophy or signs of cardiac/valvular dysfunction.

iamglimy Avatar
iamglimy:#44268864

>>44268785
It depends on what the test is and of course you have to run through a highly controlled test that has been run through a good enough sample size.
However there are no proofs that you can increase general intelligence on a personal level.
This is where you need be very careful since IQ = SCORE on intelligence test and what you are actually probably trying to affect is the general intelligence, "g factor". The IQ score is just a surrogate for it.

kinday Avatar
kinday:#44268891

>>44268864
Le internet daddy has also spoken about it in some lectures
https://youtu.be/goxR1m5qBrg

lanceguyatt Avatar
lanceguyatt:#44268924

>>44268864
Recently. Study has been published on biorXiv using fMRI to study how fast learners have particular neuronal pathways that make it easier to form conceptual associations and a better use of long-term memory. If we can find an anatomical rather than purely genetical/microstructural way thst intelligence manifests itself, we can pave the way for new interventions (pharmacological and surgical) to improve one's intelligence.

Of course it wouldn't beforrecreational uses. It would be reserved for people dementing from dementia, for example.

starburst1977 Avatar
starburst1977:#44268929

>>44268749
Do you have any evidence that ketosis increases brain function?

abotap Avatar
abotap:#44268947

>>44268924
The point still stands that no one has been able to do it. Probably in the future someone can when we know more about the brain and medicine advances.

fffabs Avatar
fffabs:#44268959

>>44268929
He meant that brain hs a higher share of glucose intermediates when lactic fermentation metabolism is in place due to high metabolic demands (or low energy supply from diet).

newbrushes Avatar
newbrushes:#44268974

>>44268929
Different fag and going off on a tangent. It has shown some promise in dementic patients who have problems with their brain energy metabolism, like Alzheimer because ketones use different pathways than glucose.

Otherwise I don't think there would really be a difference other than not crashing and feeling like going to sleep after filling you stomach with mashed potato or pasta.

gretacastellana Avatar
gretacastellana:#44268984

>>44268947
Actually, the real point is the lack of methodological rigour in said studies. We have not had a single meta-analysis in the last 10 years to test this hypothesis.

karsh Avatar
karsh:#44268996

>>44268984
A meta analysis wouldn't even be needed. Just RCT with a two split group. One is administered a treatment, the other not and then both are given IQ tests.
It's a pretty simple test to do.

ffbel Avatar
ffbel:#44269014

Drink a litre of bleach and try being white.

mbilderbach Avatar
mbilderbach:#44269030

>>44268996
Isolated RCT's are in a lower evidence tier than properly conducted meta-analyses using multiple, multicentered, properly performed RCTs.

I made an RCT myself when in residence and I recognized it is extremely poor due to low sample size and selection bias.

anaami Avatar
anaami:#44269047

>>44269014
xDDD so funny

itsracine Avatar
itsracine:#44269051

Why

areus Avatar
areus:#44269065

>>44269030
That's why the sample size just has to be big enough. In any case to my knowledge no such study has been made where it has been proven that IQ was raised.

polarity Avatar
polarity:#44269076

>>44269065
and if you cannot even do an RCT then there is no point in a meta study

leelkennedy Avatar
leelkennedy:#44269138

>>44269065
It is not only a matter of sample size. It is a metter of proper blinding, diminishing publishing and selection bias, diminishing number of variables being tested for... You can't expect that a single RCt, with an arbitrarily large sample size, to be able to provide better evidence than a single meta-analysis using an arbitrary number of studies with total sample size equal to that of the first RCT.

But again, there isn't any concrete research that supports the "unchangeness of IQ", at least nothing that validates that perpetual repetition of this "dogma".

millinet Avatar
millinet:#44269216

>>44269138
Proper blinding, selection bias et.c. are the reason you use RCTs.
You cannot change the rules for IQ studies, the same statistical analysis process has to follow. Doesn't matter if you are testing some new drug for migraines or for improving IQ. Crunching the numbers is the same.

joynalrab Avatar
joynalrab:#44269226

>>44269138
>But again, there isn't any concrete research that supports the "unchangeness of IQ", at least nothing that validates that perpetual repetition of this "dogma".
That argument is retarded. "You can't prove there is no God!".

yesmeck Avatar
yesmeck:#44269331

I read somewhere that it's actually possible to raise iq. If my brain isn't fucking with me and if I will be able to remember where I've read that I'll post a link here.
But if you want to think better and cheat iq tests then just learn logic and geometry. Literally buy a school-level textbook on geometry and go through it proving everything and doing every problem by yourself. Try to do as much as you can in your head and only go to the paper if you can't do it otherwise. At first it will be painful but you'll see an improvement pretty fast.

layerssss Avatar
layerssss:#44269403

>>44269216
You'd be amazed at how many low quality RCTs exist that have been given a lot of attention both in the general media and in the scientific field (any RCT linking proton-pump inhibitors with higher incidence of cancer as a 'secondary outcome', for example).
And I am not saying that we can't prove the inexistence of God. I am saying we can't be so sure as to disencourage any Bernd to try to increase his IQ because of outdated and poorly performed research.

It is one thing to say that Omeprazole decreases the incidence of oesophageal cancer and may be associated with encephalopathy on long term use. It is another thing to say that Omeprazole leads to Alzheimer.

vj_demien Avatar
vj_demien:#44269431

It's possible to practice IQ tests and get better at them.

slaterjohn Avatar
slaterjohn:#44269479

Yes.
Do you know how to increase attention and concentration?

It gives, at least, more "time" to do the test.

marrimo Avatar
marrimo:#44269498

Reading books increase your pseudo IQ, is better than nothing

otozk Avatar
otozk:#44269502

>>44269403
Of course there are bad RCTs. That's why you have meta studies(e.g. meta study on saturated fat and cardiovascular disease by Souza et. al).
However you first have to have the RCTs. For IQ increase, they do not exist.
What are you going to perform the meta study on if there are no single studies to draw upon?

chanpory Avatar
chanpory:#44269549

>>44269502
Agreed.

What I object is the whole "one RCT is good enough". It may be temporarily good, but it is not "good enough".